*Who Knew Librarians Loved Acronyms?
Well, phew! Back in a simpler time (last week), I had a very halcyon view of cataloging. I pictured a librarian receiving a book, following some three-digit organization system that might require a moment of thought, then adding the first three letters of the author's last name, and ta-da! All set! If I had given it a few moments of thought, it would not have made sense, but...details.
I've been picking up (and putting down, and picking up, and putting down...) the third edition of Catalog It!: A Guide to Cataloging School Library Materials. The writing is surprisingly engaging for a textbook, but it's slow-going as it feels like I'm reading a foreign language and typically I'm tackling it around 9:30pm nightly.
In that regard, here is my acronym cheatsheet for the first three chapters of Catalog It!
Well, phew! Back in a simpler time (last week), I had a very halcyon view of cataloging. I pictured a librarian receiving a book, following some three-digit organization system that might require a moment of thought, then adding the first three letters of the author's last name, and ta-da! All set! If I had given it a few moments of thought, it would not have made sense, but...details.
I've been picking up (and putting down, and picking up, and putting down...) the third edition of Catalog It!: A Guide to Cataloging School Library Materials. The writing is surprisingly engaging for a textbook, but it's slow-going as it feels like I'm reading a foreign language and typically I'm tackling it around 9:30pm nightly.
In that regard, here is my acronym cheatsheet for the first three chapters of Catalog It!
RDA: Resource Description and Access
- Provides information on WHAT should be recorded, but not how to do it
- The foundation of RDA “rests squarely on the constructs of FRBR and FRAD.
pXIII, 7
AACR: Anglo-American Cataloging Rules
- Frequently revised…
P5
ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description
- “While troublesome at first for the new cataloger, it is just one aspect of the bibliographic record that makes it possible for library users to feel comfortable in using different types of libraries in their communities and around the world.”
P5
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
- FRBR is based on the concepts of “work,” “expression,” “manifestation,” and “item” (WEMI) rather than “information package” and “surrogate record”
- There is much more emphasis on relationships between items rather than the isolation of individual items
P7. 8
WEMI: “work” “expression” “manifestation” and “item”
- WORK: could mean a “higher level of abstraction, the conceptual content that underlies all of the linguistic versions, the story being told in the book, the ideas in a person’s head for the book”
- EXPRESSION: “when we say book, as in ‘who translated the book,’ we may have a particular text in mind and a specific language”
- MANIFESTATION: “We may know its ISBN but the particular copy does not matter as long as it’s in good condition and not missing pages”
- ITEM: “when we say ‘book’ to describe a physical object that has paper pages and a binding...FRBR calls that an ’item’”
P7, 8
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
- Designed to help draw connections between names, such as names of creators, corporations, titles, concepts, objects and places
- For example, drawing connections between William Shakespeare, Romeo & Juliet, and Leonardo DiCaprio
P8
Surrogate Record: basically, bibliographic record
- Includes information about the physical and intellectual aspects of an item and its location in the collection. There have been three types of surrogate records:
- The Book list: became more practical with the advent of computers and easily updating lists without having to rewrite them. “Union lists are often published this way”
- Card Catalog: the problem was creating cards for all three types of entries: title, author, subject
- Electronic Record: easily updated, shared. Multiple subject headings, added titles and notes can be created with ease
P9, 10
MARC Records: MAchine Readable Cataloging
- Has become a national and international template for creating surrogate records in an electronic environment
- Is it software???
- A MARC record is divided into three parts: the leader, directory, and variable fields
P11, 24
BIBFRAME: Bibliographic Framework
- Slated to replace MARC
P. 11
OPAC: Online Public Access Catalog
- How people share their cataloging efforts & records so that others can grab them for their own libraries
P11
CIP: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Program
- LOC CIP makes cards from galleys from publishers
- When the book is published, the publisher includes the CIP data on the copyright page thereby facilitating book processing for libraries and book dealers
- Ergo, often there are errors (changes from galley to final)
- Do people still use these?
- Other people now create CIPs…?
- www.loc.gov/publish/cip
P12
ASCII: American Standard Code for Information Interchange standards
- What the typography in the MARC record is based on

Comments
Post a Comment